after rapper was found guilty in Megan Thee Stallion shooting Kylie Jenner plays unreleased Tory Lanez track in latest 'silly' TikTok. Georgina Rodriguez puts on a leggy display in a cream mini dress and racy purple boots as she steps out with boyfriend Cristiano Ronaldo in Madrid as she's latest 1980s icon to appear on hit Netflix series The Terminator star Linda Hamilton joins cast of Stranger Things for fifth and final season. Kevin Costner's estranged wife looks unbothered as she drives off in Range Rover from $145m home she refuses to vacate Take That's Howard Donald AXED from Nottingham Pride for liking homophobic tweets as singer says he's 'disappointed' in himself No value was put on Mr Mills's business interests, but the court was told that he had previously been able to draw dividends from them of up to £200,000 a year. 'The husband has and had the ability to make the maintenance payments asked for.' The order should have been that the husband pay maintenance in the sum of £1,441 a month until further order of the court. 'It is impossible for the court to ascertain how the £341 a month difference was to be saved by the wife. He didn't make the findings to justify the lower figure,' he added. 'He concluded that the wife would not be able to move towards independence,' he said. Judge Everall had calculated the wife's 'needs' at £1,441 a month, but had gone on to order that her monthly maintenance should not be increased from £1,100.īut Sir Ernest said that 'shortfall' was unexplained and left Mrs Mills out of pocket. 'She is not a good businesswoman. The wife now says the judge left her unable to meet her basic needs,' he added. Referring to Mrs Mills, he said: 'She had unwisely invested in a series of properties, each time moving upmarket, with the consequence that she is now without any of the capital she was given in 2002. Sir Ernest, giving the court's ruling, said Mr Mills had been regarded as 'reliable, truthful and frank' by Judge Everall, who had been 'less impressed with the wife.' Mr Feehan also defended Mrs Mills's 'credit card debts, run up over many years as a single parent having health difficulties'.Īsking for an increase in maintenance, he said Mrs Mills is currently 'unable to meet her basic needs'. He added: 'The husband has done all that could be reasonably expected of him in his reasonable wish to move on post-divorce.'īut Frank Feehan QC, for Mrs Mills, pointed out that the original judge did not find Mrs Mills was 'profligate or wanton in her approach to her finances.'Īlthough she was 'not a good businesswoman' and 'did not manage her finances wisely', the judge accepted that her finances and ability to work had been 'hindered' by health problems. 'Since 2002, the wife's management of her finances has been so poor that she appears to have exhausted her entire capital, and seeks to continue and now increase the periodical payments element of the order.' 'The time is long overdue for the wife to terminate her financial dependency on the husband. 'It is the husband's case that he should not be the insurer against the wife's poor financial decisions, taken over the course of the 15 years that have passed since the original ancillary relief order. Mrs Mills later moved to a two-bedroom apartment in a luxury Victorian mansion block in Battersea (pictured) 'This is a case where the wife leaves the marriage with all, or almost all the liquid capital, then says she needs maintenance for another 50 years, despite proving herself capable of working to a high standard,' he said. Philip Cayford QC, for Mr Mills, told the judges that he is desperate to 'move on' with his life and that a decision in favour of Mrs Mills went against 'the tide towards seeking independence'. Judge Mark Everall QC - who heard the original case - threw out both their challenges, but both parties then each instructed QCs to renew their battle before the Court of Appeal. Her husband - who has since remarried and has another child with his new wife - went to judges in a bid to get a clean break, the court heard. The judge said the pair both went before a family judge last year, with the wife asking for more maintenance because she could not manage financially. She is now living in a rented home, back where she started in Weybridge, and works two days a week as a beauty therapist, the court heard. She then took out a bigger mortgage and moved to this three-bedroom flat in Wimbledon
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |